News about Obama's blunder in Pennsylvania and letting his thoughts get the best of him were on the news and on everyone's lips. Being confused and treated to a string of speculations, reckoning and personal take on the incident, I surfed to see for my self. The damning statement was…

 “they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

As I read each word and try to interpret the phrase, it just doesn't sound as menacing as it was made to appear. In all intents and purposes, Obama is a very courageous candidate, he spoke his mind even if it hurt him. Isn't that what a Head of State is supposed to do?  My vote is important, and I feel it should go to the politician who'd risk everyones vote just to give the nation a glimpse of where we must correct ourselves. I find it funny that Obama's opponents have made a circus of his statement, twisting the interpretation just to get people to vote for them and the other party, lol!

The statement was made to stress a people's sense of hope and where it lies. Religion plays a big part in a person's life, it is where we learn good from evil. World peace would never come at the barrel of an AK-47, ever!